onepot.AI Logo

onepot-Bench 0.5

Language-model agents reading LC–MS reaction screens: deciding whether the intended product formed, and what else occurred. Built on unpublished screening acquisitions from onepot's own lab, judged against chemist-adjudicated references.

Read the announcement

Product confirmation. The agent receives a well's LC–MS acquisition file, the intended product, the starting materials and reagents, and decides whether the intended product formed. It works with code execution, extracting ion traces and weighing the evidence itself.

View
Prompt
Provider
Accuracy against cost
calibrated rule (75.0%)
607080901000.3131030100Cost per well (¢, log)Accuracy (%)Gemini 4 ArgonGrok 4.6Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash

20 wells, half of them with the product, enriched for hard cases. Each model is scored with a more open-ended prompt and with one giving more guidance on judging detection. The dashed line is a simple detection rule, a level any model should clear.

Cell color
40100%
ModelSensitivitySpecificityAccuracy¢ / well
Gemini 4 Argon1008391.734.2
Grok 4.6939091.733.6
Claude Opus 5879390.053.8
GLM 5.3 Flash938790.02.2
Grok 4.7839388.370.1
Gemini 3.7 Flash938086.714.2
Claude Opus 5.5809386.715.1
GPT-5.6 Terra878786.712.2
Claude Haiku 5.5779385.00.6
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash739785.011.8
Claude Fable 5.1779083.338.6
Gemini 3.8 Flash937081.732.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5709381.74.8
Claude Sonnet 5838081.719.9
GPT-5.6 Sol976781.725.3
GPT-5.6 Luna1006080.01.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro639076.739.1
DeepSeek V4 Flash609075.02.1
GPT-6.1 Sol539775.09.3
GPT-6 Astra5010075.061.3
Calibrated rule (baseline)75.0
GPT-6 Luna578068.30.8
Claude Haiku 4.5706065.017.1

Values are percentages.